A survey of more than 1,400 Louisiana adults, conducted from July 19 to July 29, 2023, found that:
The intersection of racial disparities in health care and affordability issues impact access to care and may
contribute to financial burdens for communities of color, particularly Black and Hispanic/Latino
communities.1,2 In Louisiana, respondents of color reported higher rates of some affordability burdens
than white respondents, including incurring medical debt, depleting savings, or sacrificing basic needs (like food, heat and housing) due to medical bills (see Table 1).
In addition to incurring medical debt, respondents of color slightly more frequently reported difficulty
getting select types of care compared to white, non-Hispanic respondents. For example, Hispanic/Latino
respondents also most frequently reported challenges accessing mental health care and addiction
treatment, as well as avoiding going to the doctor or getting a procedure done to cost (see Figure 1).3
The survey also revealed differences in how Louisiana respondents experience health care affordability
burdens by income. Unsurprisingly, respondents at the lower end of the income spectrum most frequently
reported affordability burdens, with two-thirds (75%) of those with household incomes of less than
$75,000 per year struggling to afford health care in the past 12 months (see Table 2). Still, over half of
respondents living in middle- and high-income households also reported struggling to afford some aspect
of coverage or care, demonstrating that affordability burdens impact people all income groups. Likewise,
at least 63% of respondents in each income group reported being worried about affording health care
either now or in the future.
Additionally, nearly two fifths (39%) of respondents with household incomes of $75,000 or less reported
not filling a prescription, skipping doses of medicines, or cutting pills in half due to cost. Lower- and
middle-income individuals also most frequently reported financial consequences after receiving health
care services—50% of individuals who earned between $50,000 and $75,000 a year either went into
medical debt, depleted their savings, or sacrificed other basic needs (like food, heat or housing) due to
medical bills, compared to 37% of those earning over $100,000.
People with disabilities interact with the health care system more often than those without disabilities and,
as a result, tend to face more out-of-pocket costs.4 Additionally, people who receive disability benefits
face unique coverage challenges that impact their ability to afford needed care, such as the possibility of
losing coverage if their household income or assets increase over a certain amount (for example, after
getting married).5 Louisiana respondents who have or live with a person who has a disability more
frequently reported a diverse array of affordability burdens compared to others (see Table 3). These
individuals also more frequently reported worrying about future health care affordability in general (87%
versus 72%) and losing health insurance specifically (47% versus 26%).
Those with disabilities also face health care affordability burdens unique to their disabilities—35% of
respondents reporting a disability in their household delayed getting a medical assistive device such as a
wheelchair, cane/walker, hearing aid or prosthetic limb due to cost. Just 10% of respondents without a
disability (who may have needed such tools temporarily or may not identify as having a disability) reported
this experience (see Figure 2). Similarly, 29% of respondents reporting a disability in their household
reported problems getting mental health care compared to 14% of households without a person with a
The survey also surfaced differences in health care affordability burdens and worry by gender. Women
who responded to the survey reported higher rates of experiencing at least one affordability burden in the
past year than those identifying as men (69% versus 64%) (see Table 4). Women also more frequently
reported delaying or going without care due to cost in general and reported higher rates of rationing their
medications by not filling a prescription, skipping doses, or cutting pills in half. While many respondents
regardless of gender reported being somewhat or very concerned about health care costs, a higher
percentage of women reported worrying about affording some aspect of coverage or care than men (83%
Whether a patient trusts and/or feels respected by their health care provider may impact whether they
seek needed care. In Louisiana, just over 1 in 3 (38% of) respondents reported that their provider never,
rarely, or only sometimes treats them with respect. When asked why they felt health care providers did
not treat them with respect, over two fifths of these respondents cited their income or financial status
(41%), followed by race (34%), disability (17%), ethnic background (17%), and gender/gender identity
(14%). In lesser numbers, respondents cited experience with violence or abuse (8%) and sexual orientation (6%) as reasons for the disrespect.
Respondents of color and those with a person with a disability in their household more frequently
reported distrust in and feeling disrespected by their health care providers compared to white
respondents those without a disabled household member (see Table 5). They also more frequently went
without medical care due to that distrust and/or disrespect.
Overall, 39% of respondents of color reported going without needed medical care due to distrust of or
feeling disrespected by health care providers, including 34% of Hispanic/Latino respondents, compared to
only 22% of white, non-Hispanic respondents. Additionally, 44% of respondents who have or are living
with a person with a disability went without care due to distrust or disrespect, compared to 17% of those
without a household member with a disability.
Respondents covered through health insurance they have purchased on their own and those with
Louisiana Medicaid reported the highest rates of distrusting or feeling disrespected by a health care
provider compared to other insurance types. In addition, respondents earning less than $50,000 most frequently reported distrust/disrespect and going without care due to distrust/disrespect, although
middle- and high-income earners also reported this issue.
Respondents perceived that both individual and systemic racism exist in the U.S. health care system. Fifty-seven percent of respondents believe that people are treated unfairly based on their race or ethnic
background, either somewhat or very often. When asked what they think causes healthcare systems to
treat people unfairly based on their race or ethnic background:
Given this information, it is not surprising that 59% of Louisiana respondents agree or strongly agree that
the U.S. health care system needs to change. Understanding how the health care system
disproportionately harms some groups of people over others is key to creating a fairer and higher value
system for all.
Making health care affordable for all residents is an area ripe for policymaker intervention, with
widespread support for government-led solutions across party lines. For more information on the types of
strategies Louisiana residents want their policymakers to pursue, see: Louisiana Residents Struggle to Afford High Healthcare Costs; Worry about Affording Healthcare in the Future; Support Government Action across Party Lines, Healthcare Value Hub, Data Brief No. 155 (August 2023).
Altarum’s Consumer Healthcare Experience State Survey (CHESS) is designed to elicit respondents’ unbiased views on a wide range of health system issues, including confidence using the health system, financial burden and possible policy solutions.
This survey, conducted from July 19 to July 29, 2023, used a web panel from online survey company Dynata with a demographically balanced sample of approximately 1,507 respondents who live in Louisiana. Information about Dynata’s recruitment and compensation methods can be found here. The survey was conducted in English or Spanish and restricted to adults ages 18 and older. Respondents who finished the survey in less than half the median time were excluded from the final sample, leaving 1,417 cases for analysis. After those exclusions, the demographic composition of respondents was as follows,
although not all demographic information has complete response rates:
Percentages in the body of the brief are based on weighted values, while the data presented in the demographic table is unweighted. An explanation of weighted versus unweighted variables is available here. Altarum does not conduct statistical calculations on the significance of differences between groups in findings. Therefore, determinations that one group experienced a significantly different affordability burden than another should not be inferred. Rather, comparisons are for conversational purposes. The groups selected for this brief were selected by advocate partners in each state based on organizational/advocacy priorities. We do not report any estimates under N=100 and a co-efficient of variance more than 0.30.