"Complex" patients represent a minority of the general population but drive a significant portion of healthcare spending. Estimates suggest that the costliest one percent of patients account for 20 percent of healthcare spending, while the costliest five percent of patients drive 50 percent. Many of these patients have multiple chronic conditions that require treatment from different providers. These providers don't always communicate with one another, however, which can sacrifice health outcomes, increase costs and frustrate patients.
Care coordination programs that treat patients holistically have emerged as an important strategy to deliver care efficiently and reduce unnecessary costs. Some programs integrate medical care with dental, behavioral and/or home health services, while others go even further to incorporate efforts to address social determinants of health, like access to transportation, adequate housing or healthy food. Social-medical models, in particular, have been shown to improve health outcomes, as approximately 40 percent of health outcomes are determined by social and economic factors.
The diversity of care coordination programs prevents researchers from conducting rigorous side-by-side comparisons to evaluate overall effectiveness. Individual evaluations show that some programs have achieved their goal to deliver high quality care, while others have attained mixed results. Nevertheless, analysis of successful models reveals some common themes:
Financial incentives are also important when it comes to incentivizing providers to work together to deliver better care. More information on provider payment reform can be found here.
1. National Academy of Medicine, "Effective Care for High Need Patients: Opportunities for Improving Outcomes, Value, and Health," Washington, D.C. (2017).
2. Alfero, Charles, et al., "Care Coordination in Rural Communities: Supporting the High Performance Rural Health System," Rural Policy Research Institute, Iowa City, Iowa (June 2015).