According to a survey of more than 1,400 New Hampshire adults, conducted from March 26 to May 14,
2024, respondents across the state are concerned about prescription drug costs and express a strong
desire for policymakers to enact solutions.
More than half (53%) of survey respondents reported being somewhat or very worried about affording
the cost of prescription drugs. Worry varied by income group, with respondents in households making
between $75,000 - $100,000 and less than $50,000 per year experiencing the most worry (see Figure
1).1 However, it is important to note that almost half (47%) of those making more than $100,000 per year
also reported worrying about the cost of prescription drugs.
In addition to the concerns about affording prescription drugs in the future, the survey reveals that a
quarter of respondents (25%) have had to ration medication due to cost concerns in the last year, which
for the purpose of this brief is defined as not filling a prescription, cutting pills in half or skipping a dose
(see Figure 2).
Respondents of Color and those who are a member of the LGBTQIA2S+ community reported the highest
rates of rationing medications due to cost, followed by those with lower-incomes and those living in
households with a person with a disability. However, these hardships are also prevalent in households of all demographics (see Table 1).
Considering the challenges respondents reported concerning prescription drug affordability, as well as
concerns about high health care costs generally,2 it is not surprising that New Hampshire respondents are
generally dissatisfied with the health care system. In fact, just 25% of respondents agreed or strongly
agreed that the United States health care system is "great," while 78% agreed or strongly agreed that the
United States health care system needs to change.
New Hampshire respondents also frequently reported that they believe that pricing decisions made by
drug companies are a major reason for high health care costs. In fact, out of fifteen options, the most
frequently cited reasons for high health care costs were:
When it comes to tackling high drug costs, New Hampshire respondents endorsed a number of
prescription drug-related strategies, including:
Moreover, there is strong bipartisan support for a variety of policies designed to address unaffordable
prescription drug costs. For example, nearly all (92% of) respondents agreed that drug companies should
be required to provide advance notice of price increases and to provide information to justify those
increases, including 90% of respondents identifying as a Republican, 96% of respondents identifying as a
Democrat and 92% of unaffiliated respondents (see Table 2).
While New Hampshire respondents overwhelmingly support government action to address high drug
costs, they also see a role for themselves. Eighty-one percent (81%) would switch from a brand-name to
an equivalent generic drug if given the chance, and 54% have sought or attempted to find the cost of a
prescription drug beforehand.
The high burden of health care and prescription drug affordability, along with high levels of support for
change, suggests that elected leaders and other stakeholders need to make addressing this consumer
burden a top priority. Recent legislative action at both the federal and state levels may positively impact
consumer affordability, specifically for prescription drugs used to treat chronic conditions such as insulin,
epinephrine autoinjectors and asthma inhalers. Annual surveys can help assess whether progress is being made.
Altarum's Consumer Healthcare Experience State Survey (CHESS) is designed to elicit respondents' views on a wide range of health system issues, including confidence using the health system, financial burden and possible policy solutions. This survey, conducted from March 26 to May 14, 2024, used a web panel from Dynata with a demographically balanced sample of approximately 1,500 respondents who live in New Hampshire. Information about Dynata's recruitment and compensation methods can be found here. The survey was conducted in English or Spanish and restricted to adults ages 18 and older. Respondents who finished the survey in less than half the median time were excluded from the final sample, leaving 1,328 cases for analysis. After those exclusions, the demographic composition of respondents was as follows, although not all demographic information has complete response rates: