A survey of more than 1,130 Nevada adults, conducted from June 21 to July 8, 2022, found that:
Like many Americans, Nevada adults experience hardship due to high healthcare costs. All told, well over half (65%) of respondents experienced one or more of the following healthcare affordability burdens in the prior 12 months:
1) Being Uninsured Due to Cost
Nearly one-half (49%) of uninsured respondents cited “too expensive” as the major reason for not having coverage, far exceeding other reasons like “don’t need it” and “don’t know how to get it.”
2) Delaying or Going Without Healthcare Due to Cost
More than half (59%) of all respondents reported delaying or going without healthcare during the prior 12 months due to cost:
Moreover, cost and the inability to get an appointment were the most frequently cited reasons for not getting needed medical care (each reported by 24% of respondents), followed by a service not being covered by insurance (17%) exceeding a host of other barriers like transportation and lack of childcare.
3) Struggling to Pay Medical Bills
Other times, respondents got the care they needed but struggled to pay the resulting bill. Two in five (40%) experienced one or more of these struggles to pay their medical bills:
Of the various types of medical bills, the ones most frequently associated with an affordability barrier were doctor bills, dental bills and prescription drugs. The high prevalence of affordability burdens for these services likely reflects the frequency with which Nevada respondents seek these services. Trouble paying for dental bills likely reflects lower rates of coverage for these services.
High Levels of Worry About Affording Healthcare in the Future
Nevada respondents also exhibit high levels of worry about affording healthcare in the future. Four in five (83%) reported being “worried” or “very worried” about affording some aspect of healthcare in the future, including:
While two of the most common worries—affording the cost of nursing home or home care services and medical costs when elderly—are applicable predominantly to an older population, they were most frequently reported by respondents ages 25-44. This finding suggests that Nevada respondents may be worried about affording the cost of care for both aging parents and themselves.
Worry about affording healthcare, generally, was highest among respondents living in lower- and middle-income households, non-white respondents and those living in households with a person with a disability (see Table 1). More than 4 in 5 (88%) of respondents with household incomes of less than $50,000 per year2 reported worrying about affording some aspect of coverage or care in the past year. Still, the vast majority of Nevada respondents of all incomes, races, ethnicities and levels of ability statewide are somewhat or very concerned.
Concern that health insurance will become unaffordable is also more prevalent among certain groups of Nevada adults. By insurance type, respondents with coverage through their employer most frequently reported worrying about both losing and affording coverage, followed by respondents who buy their insurance on their own and those with Nevada Medicaid (see Figure 1).
Those with household incomes below $50,000 per year reported the highest rates of worry about losing coverage, while respondents with household incomes between $75,001 and $99,999 reported the highest rates of worry about affording coverage. Rural respondents and those living in households with a person with a disability were more likely to be concerned about losing health insurance specifically than their non-rural and non-disabled counterparts (see Table 2).
Concerns about affording coverage exceeded fears about losing coverage across all income groups, disability statuses, geographic settings and coverage types.
The survey also revealed differences in how Nevada respondents experience healthcare affordability burdens by income, age, geographic setting and disability status.
Income and Age
Unsurprisingly, respondents at the lowest end of the income spectrum most frequently reported experiencing one or more healthcare affordability burdens, with nearly three-quarters (72%) of those earning less than $50,000 reporting struggling to afford some aspect of coverage or care in the past 12 months (see Figure 2). This may, in part, be due to respondents in this income group reporting the highest rates of going without care and rationing their medication due to cost (see Figure 3).
Further analysis found that Nevada respondents ages 18-44 reported higher rates of going without care due to cost than respondents ages 45 and up (see Figure 4). Respondents ages 25-34 most frequently reported rationing medication due to cost, compared to other groups.
Respondents with Nevada Medicaid coverage reported the highest rates of going without care due to cost, while the highest rates of rationing medication were reported by respondents that buy their own healthcare coverage (see Table 3).4 Still, well over half of respondents with employer-sponsored insurance went without care due to cost.
Non-white respondents reported higher rates of going without care and rationing medication due to cost when compared to white respondents (see Table 3). Further analysis showed that non-white respondents had slightly higher rates of problems getting mental health care, problems getting addiction treatment and skipping needed dental care (see Figure 5).
Of all the demographic groups measured, respondents living in households with a person with a disability reported the highest rates of going without care and rationing medication due to cost in the past 12 months. More than 7 in 10 (78%) of respondents in this group went without some form of care and almost half (47%) rationed medication, compared to 51% and 22% of respondents living in households without a person with a disability, respectively (see Table 3). Respondents living in households with a person with a disability also more frequently reported delaying or skipping getting mental healthcare, addiction treatment and dental care, among other health care services, than those in households without a person with a disability due to cost concerns (see Table 4).
Those with disabilities also face healthcare affordability burdens unique to their disabilities—28% of respondents reporting a disability in their household reported delaying getting a medical assistive device such as a wheelchair, cane/walker, hearing aid or prosthetic limb due to cost. Just 8% of respondents without a person with a disability (who may have needed such tools temporarily or may not identify as having a disability) reported having this experience.
Likelihood of Encountering Medical Debt
The survey also showed differences in the prevalence of financial burdens due to medical bills, including going into medical debt, depleting savings and being unable to pay for basic necessities (like food, heat and housing) by income, race, disability status and geographic setting. Forty-five percent of American Indian or Native Alaskan, Asian and Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander and 45% of Black or African American respondents reported going into debt, depleting savings or going without other needs due to medical bills, compared to 39% of white respondents (see Table 5). The rate of financial burden is even higher for respondents who identified as Hispanic/Latinc (51%).
Respondents living in households with a person with a disability had an even greater disparity, with more than half (59%) reporting going into debt or going without other needs due to medical bills, compared to 1 in 3 (31%) of respondents living in households without a disabled member. Geographically, Nevada respondents living in rural counties reported higher rates of going into debt or going without other needs due to medical bills (52%) than respondents from non-rural counties (37%). In addition, respondents who purchased insurance on their own reported the highest rate of the above financial burdens due to medical bills (53%) compared to all other insurance types.
In light of Nevada respondents' healthcare affordability burdens and concerns, it is not surprising that they are dissatisfied with the health system:
To investigate further, the survey asked about both personal and governmental actions to address health system problems.
Nevada respondents see a role for themselves in addressing healthcare affordability. When asked about specific actions they could take:
When asked to select the top three personal actions they felt would be most effective in addressing healthcare affordability (out of ten options), the most common responses were:
Far and away, Nevada respondents see government as the key stakeholder that needs to act to address health system problems. Moreover, addressing healthcare problems is a top priority that respondents want their elected officials to work on.
At the beginning of the survey, respondents were asked what issues the government should address in the upcoming year. The top responses were:
When asked about the top three healthcare priorities the government should work on, the top vote getters were:
Of more than 20 options, Missouri respondents believe the reason for high healthcare costs is unfair prices charged by powerful industry stakeholders:
When it comes to tackling costs, respondents endorsed a number of strategies, including:
There is also remarkable support for change regardless of respondents’ political affiliation (see Table 6).
The high burden of healthcare affordability, along with high levels of support for change, suggest that elected leaders and other stakeholders should make addressing this consumer burden a top priority. Moreover, the current COVID crisis has led state residents to take a hard look at how well health and public health systems are working for them, with strong support for a wide variety of actions. Annual surveys can help assess whether progress is being made.
1. Of the current 59% of Nevada respondents who encountered one or more cost-related barriers to getting healthcare during the prior 12 months, 24% did not fill a prescription, while 18% cut pills in half or skipped doses of medicine due to cost.
2. Median household income in Nevada was $62,043 (2016-2020). U.S. Census, Quick Facts. Retrieved from: U.S. Census Bureau: QuickFacts: Nevada, https://www.census.gov/quickfacts/NV
3. Nearly 2 in 3 (65%) of respondents said that they would consider using their tax forms to sign up for health insurance if they or their family needed it. This high level of interest persisted across racial, ethnic and income groups, with the highest levels of interest among Asian group respondents (75%) and those earning between $75,001 and $99,999 (71%).
4. Although Nevada Medicaid covers a wide range of services without cost-sharing for beneficiaries, not every healthcare service is covered (e.g., dental services).
Altarum’s Consumer Healthcare Experience State Survey (CHESS) is designed to elicit respondents’ unbiased views on a wide range of health system issues, including confidence using the health system, financial burden and views on fixes that might be needed.
The survey used a web panel from Dynata with a demographically balanced sample of approximately 1,371 respondents who live in Nevada. The survey was conducted in English or Spanish and restricted to adults ages 18 and older. Respondents who finished the survey in less than half the median time were excluded from the final sample, leaving 1,139 cases for analysis. After those exclusions, the demographic composition of respondents was as follows, although not all demographic information has complete response rates: